| re: Second Pulitzer |
| Last Edit: MockingbirdGirl 06:35 pm EDT 10/08/23 |
| Posted by: MockingbirdGirl 06:34 pm EDT 10/08/23 |
| In reply to: re: Second Pulitzer - writerkev 06:24 pm EDT 10/08/23 |
|
aleck's memory is not faulty—at least regarding how it was considered. There were contradictory instructions handed down to the jury:
(I'm less convinces anyone was ostracized over it, though.) |
| Link |
NYT: Confusion Over the Pulitzer (April 15, 1994) |
|
reply to
this message
|
