| re: I was responding to revisal, not revival |
| Posted by: Singapore/Fling 03:02 pm EST 02/29/24 |
| In reply to: re: I was responding to revisal, not revival - BroadwayTonyJ 02:06 pm EST 02/29/24 |
|
Dude, I know you don’t like being wrong and bristle at being challenged, but in this case, facts are facts. Ken is clear that he didn’t revise anything; he was hired to do a revisals and then quickly got permission to make his own show.
You could offer a more detailed analysis at why you think Ty her resulting script is still inherently Girl Crazy, but to instead punt to “we each believe what way believe”? No, you’re better than that. |
|
reply
|
|
| Previous: |
re: I was responding to revisal, not revival - BroadwayTonyJ 02:06 pm EST 02/29/24 |
| Next: |
re: I was responding to revisal, not revival - BroadwayTonyJ 03:40 pm EST 02/29/24 |
| Thread: |
|
