| re: snark not necessary.. |
| Last Edit: Chromolume 09:26 am EST 02/04/24 |
| Posted by: Chromolume 09:24 am EST 02/04/24 |
| In reply to: re: snark not necessary.. - kidmanboy 07:56 am EST 02/04/24 |
|
It does seem odd that they would hire someone who was not available for the entirety of the 2-week run.
Which to me, seems to make the elimination of the Minstrel (making the Minstrel and Jester one character) even more unnecessary. It's a shame they couldn't do the show as written. (I have to imagine that "Normandy" in particular suffers without both parts there.)
I've done the show several times and I would generally agree that it's a fun show but by no means a great one - but certainly not a bad show either. |
|
reply
|
|
| Previous: |
re: That's what I was thinking. - Ann 03:29 pm EST 02/05/24 |
| Next: |
re: snark not necessary.. - MistressAndy 04:48 pm EST 02/05/24 |
| Thread: |
|
