| re: Mandy Greenfield: Why does Lempicka give her the WTF Credit? | |
| Posted by: ryhog 04:01 pm EDT 04/06/24 | |
| In reply to: re: Mandy Greenfield: Why does Lempicka give her the WTF Credit? - ShowGoer 11:41 am EDT 04/06/24 | |
|
|
|
| An "in association with" billing is contractual and a producing credit, not an artistic one. I would be surprised if this contract was entered into during Greenfield's tenure or signed by her. The credit belongs to the institution and as such I would also be surprised that it would retain a prior AD's name, unless I am in for a big surprise. I know nothing about this production or its papers but as far as I can tell nothing suggests that she has a personal credit on this. The analogy to Hello Dolly is faulty because Rudin was the lead producer there, in his own name. I would expect he has a right to an "originally produced by" credit or some such. | |
| reply | |
|
|
|
| Previous: | re: Mandy Greenfield: Why does Lempicka give her the WTF Credit? - ShowGoer 11:41 am EDT 04/06/24 |
| Next: | re: Mandy Greenfield: Why does Lempicka give her the WTF Credit? - Singapore/Fling 06:13 pm EDT 04/06/24 |
| Thread: |
|
Time to render: 0.350740 seconds.